2006-2007 (Actual record was 24-10 (11-7), and can be found here)
2007-2008 (Actual record was 25-10 (11-7), and can be found here)
2008-2009 (Actual record was 25-10 (13-7), and can be found here)
Onto the 2009-2010 season predictions!
Date | Opponent | Rob | Tim | Kevin | MU92 | John | bma | |
11/13/2009 | Centenary | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
11/17/2009 | UM-Eastern Shore | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
11/21/2009 | Grambling | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
11/24/2009 | South Dakota | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
11/26/2009 | Xavier (Old Spice Classic) | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
11/27/2009 | Creighton / Michigan | L | W | W | L | L | L | |
11/29/2009 | Bama, Baylor, FSU, or Iona | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
12/5/2009 | NC State | W | L | L | W | L | W | |
12/8/2009 | UWM | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
12/12/2009 | at UW-Madison | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
12/19/2009 | North Florida | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
12/27/2009 | Presbyterian | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
12/29/2009 | at WVU | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
1/2/2010 | Villanova | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
1/6/2010 | Georgetown | L | W | L | L | L | L | |
1/9/2010 | at Villanova | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
1/17/2010 | Providence | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
1/20/2010 | at DePaul | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
1/23/2010 | at Syracuse | L | L | L | L | L | W | |
1/26/2010 | Rutgers | W | L | W | W | L | W | |
1/30/2010 | at Connecticut | L | L | L | L | L | L | |
2/3/2010 | DePaul | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
2/6/2010 | at Providence | L | W | L | L | W | W | |
2/13/2010 | South Florida | W | W | W | W | W | W | |
2/18/2010 | Pittsburgh | W | L | L | W | W | L | |
2/21/2010 | at Cincinnati | L | W | L | L | L | L | |
2/24/2010 | at St. Johns | W | L | W | L | L | W | |
2/28/2010 | at Seton Hall | L | W | L | L | W | L | |
3/2/2010 | Louisville | L | L | L | L | W | L | |
3/6/2010 | Notre Dame | W | W | L | W | W | W | |
Average | ||||||||
Full Season Wins | 17 | 18 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 16.5 | |
Full Season Losses | 13 | 12 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 13.5 | |
Conference Wins | 8 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7.8 | |
Conference Losses | 10 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 10.2 |
Some commentary on the selections:
John
My theory is always that if you have experience (last year), you start hot and teams catch up to you late in the year, and if you have inexperienced talent (like this year), you improve throughout the year. We don’t even have four guards to go two-on-two in practice now, and I don’ t think we will be ready for even NC State, much less the trip to Madison, the Old Spice Tournament or the first four games of the Big East season. If we have a winning record January 10, we are ahead of schedule and could make a late run at the tournament. However, even if we are 8-8 at that point, if the freshmen aren’t getting booed and/or discouraged, I believe we really finish strong with two wins in the Big East tourney to take a 19-13 resume into selection Sunday.
Kevin
I have no idea how this team will perform. On paper, we’ve got one star (Acker!) and a bunch of guys who might be great, and might be busts. (Ok, Lazar and Butler are pretty good too.) -- Add to that some injuries, and my outlook is grim. Road wins are few and far between in the Big East, and it was tough to mark down even one road-W. Couple that with a ~50/50 win rate at home, and that gets you to a 5-13 Big East whitewash. Hope I’m wrong. I hope they win @DePaul. I hope they can outlast Pitt at the BC. Maybe eek out a win @ Seton Hall, and for the love of god, beat ND on Senior Night. That’d get us to 9-9. Hope against hope.
Rob
Like most of the fellow bloggers, I just see the first four games as being too brutal of a hole to overcome. I see MU splitting with Providence and beating DePaul twice, and then taking care of the reasonably close games at home like Pitt and ND. However, this team could easily surprise better or worse than these predictions by a wide range.
bma725
The only caveat for me is the final game of the OSC is based on the idea we're playing Iona. If it's anyone else, that should be changed to a loss for me. I may be a bit optimistic, but I think those predicting complete doom (meaning Kevin), are forgetting one that while we may have lost a lot of talent from last year, so did everyone else...and we reloaded a heck of a lot better than some of these other teams. We're not in as bad a shape as people think, especially if we can avoid further injuries. This isn't the deep Big East of last year, and I think our record will reflect that.
Tim
This is one tough team to predict. Somehow I have MU finishing with 18 wins and 9-9 in the BIG EAST. While the conference will take a step back from last year's extraordinarily top-heavy group, I think this year the league will be much more balanced until you get to the very bottom (hello DePaul!). With that balance comes greater unpredictability -- still, I can't come up with a scenario where MU finishes better than 9-9 and I see a much greater risk of a downside slide rather than an upside surprise.
muwarrior92
Youth is the reason I went with the predictions I did. I also believe we are very thin at guard and have always believed good guards carry you in college basketball. Road victories will be at a premium this year. Like bma, I kept thinking about the BE being down as well. However, I think teams like St. Johns and Seton Hall, with their experience, will be better simply because of the experience and not the talent. My biggest concern for the season is the injury bug since we’re so thin and injuries have followed Crean and Buzz like the plague it seems.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: We welcome alternative opinions on CrackedSidewalks. However, this is not an open forum without moderation. If what you post fails to be intelligent or productive, we reserve the right to remove your comment from publication without hesitation.
Anonymous comments will be scrutinized.
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by forum participants on this web site do not necessarily reflect the CrackedSidewalks Team.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.