We
hope Marquette can pick up one of the top available players from our rankings
here. Tonight we run through the competition -
ranking all the conferences competing with the Big East for bids, and ranking
both their teams and top 40 players.
It doesn't look like the American East will invite the nations only independent to join, but we are putting the New Jersey Institute of Technology there after their big upset of Michigan several days after almost upsetting Marquette. The would be right in the mix for the title with Vermont, Albany and Stony Point if in fact Jameel Warney is back for another near All-American level season.
It doesn't look like the American East will invite the nations only independent to join, but we are putting the New Jersey Institute of Technology there after their big upset of Michigan several days after almost upsetting Marquette. The would be right in the mix for the title with Vermont, Albany and Stony Point if in fact Jameel Warney is back for another near All-American level season.
Natl Rnk | Conference | Team | Record | Raw | Value Add |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
29 | American East & NJIT | AE | 8.79 | ||
169 | NJ Inst of Technology | 21--12 | 14.43 | 15.13 | |
184 | Vermont | 20--14 | 8.11 | 14.05 | |
196 | Stony Brook | 23--12 | 7.46 | 13.05 | |
198 | Albany | 24--9 | 7.20 | 12.91 | |
242 | New Hampshire | 19--13 | 5.31 | 10.07 | |
310 | Massachusetts Lowell | 12--17 | 6.69 | 6.52 | |
320 | Hartford | 14--16 | 3.68 | 5.73 | |
328 | Binghamton | 6--26 | 5.57 | 5.11 | |
344 | Maryland Baltimore Co | 4--26 | 3.91 | 3.34 | |
349 | Maine | 3--27 | 1.23 | 1.93 | |
Natl Rnk | Top 40 Players | Team | Ht | Yr | Value Add |
25 | Warney, Jameel 20 | Stony Brook | 6'8 | 4 Sr | 8.12 |
96 | Wills, Dre 24 | Vermont | 6'1 | 3 Jr | 6.27 |
366 | O'Day, Ethan 32 | Vermont | 6'9 | 4 Sr | 4.11 |
386 | Walker, Ahmad | Albany/maybe | 6'4 | 3 Jr | 4 |
402 | Willis, Winfield 11 | NJ Inst of Technology | 6'0 | 4 Sr | 3.98 |
440 | Ward, Cam 14 | Vermont | 6'2 | 2 So | 3.82 |
448 | McRoberts, Zach 1 | Vermont | 6'6 | 2 So | 3.8 |
461 | Coleman, Tim 2 | NJ Inst of Technology | 6'5 | 3 Jr | 3.73 |
605 | Nyama, Roland 24 | Stony Brook | 6'6 | 2 So | 3.19 |
720 | Sanders, Ray 1 | Albany | 6'4 | 4 Sr | 2.88 |
732 | Singletary, Evan 0 | Albany | 6'1 | 4 Sr | 2.84 |
757 | Bell-Haynes, Trae 2 | Vermont | 6'2 | 2 So | 2.79 |
779 | Thomas, Jahad 10 | Massachusetts Lowell | 6'2 | 2 So | 2.71 |
885 | Rodriguez, Willie 42 | Binghamton | 6'6 | 2 So | 2.48 |
890 | Leissner, Tanner 21 | New Hampshire | 6'6 | 2 So | 2.48 |
910 | Steidel, Kurt 34 | Vermont | 6'6 | 3 Jr | 2.44 |
913 | Grant, Jourdan 5 | Maryland Baltimore Co | 6'2 | 2 So | 2.42 |
941 | Smith, Jaleen 0 | New Hampshire | 6'4 | 3 Jr | 2.37 |
990 | Lynn, Damon 5 | NJ Inst of Technology | 5'11 | 3 Jr | 2.27 |
1106 | Ukawuba, Rob 25 | NJ Inst of Technology | 6'3 | 3 Jr | 2.1 |
1128 | Puriefoy, Carson 10 | Stony Brook | 6'0 | 4 Sr | 2.05 |
1149 | Crawford, Lance 0 | Massachusetts Lowell | 5'10 | 2 So | 2.02 |
1236 | Hatton, Brandon 0 | Vermont | 6'3 | 2 So | 1.92 |
1249 | McGrew, Rayshaun 21 | Stony Brook | 6'7 | 4 Sr | 1.89 |
1277 | Hooley, Peter 12 | Albany | 6'4 | 4 Sr | 1.84 |
1286 | Harris, Matt 22 | Massachusetts Lowell | 6'1 | 2 So | 1.84 |
1287 | Howard, Ky 0 | NJ Inst of Technology | 6'4 | 4 Sr | 1.84 |
1508 | Sturdivant, Tyrell 12 | Stony Brook | 6'7 | 2 So | 1.56 |
1732 | Graham, Justin 2 | Hartford | 6'1 | 3 Jr | 1.27 |
1781 | Grace, Ben 3 | Maryland Baltimore Co | 5'10 | 3 Jr | 1.21 |
1871 | Stire, Greig 43 | Albany | 6'7 | 2 So | 1.11 |
1878 | Lawton, Shaun 10 | Maine | 6'5 | 4 Sr | 1.11 |
1902 | Rinaldi, John 12 | Binghamton | 6'1 | 3 Jr | 1.09 |
1964 | Green, Tre 2 | Albany | 6'3 | 3 Jr | 1.01 |
2253 | Speidel, Josh | Vermont | 6'7 | 1 Fr | 1 |
2327 | Waller, Karon 0 | Binghamton | 6'4 | 4 Sr | 0.93 |
2343 | Dyson, Taylor 11 | Hartford | 6'4 | 4 Sr | 0.92 |
2401 | Arciero, Noah 20 | Hartford | 6'6 | 2 So | 0.87 |
2609 | Hobbs, Jack 21 | Hartford | 6'7 | 3 Jr | 0.62 |
2696 | Walker, Romello 11 | Binghamton | 6'6 | 2 So | 0.51 |
These are the top 40 players in the conference based on the
rankings at www.valueaddbasketball.com.
The team rankings are 50% based on the sum of each team’s Value Add ratings and
50% based on last year (since better teams typically replenish after losing
stars). With over 4000 players projected in the database, we WELCOME all
corrections in the comments field.
Value Add was first introduced on www.crackedsidewalks.com, and
calculates how many points better each player is worth to his team over how good
they would be if he was replaced. The projections measure the standard
improvement in a player between his freshman, sophomore, junior and senior
seasons, and the evaluation of incoming freshman and JUCO players.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: We welcome alternative opinions on CrackedSidewalks. However, this is not an open forum without moderation. If what you post fails to be intelligent or productive, we reserve the right to remove your comment from publication without hesitation.
Anonymous comments will be scrutinized.
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by forum participants on this web site do not necessarily reflect the CrackedSidewalks Team.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.