For those of you who do not follow it, this is basically the formula NBA coaches use to give a point for everything good a player can do (points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks) and take a point away for everything negative (turnovers, missed free throws and field goals). My slight variation has always been to double up steals and blocks, and only take away half for each missed free throw.
Dwyane Wade is No. 1 with a net positive 20,864 NBA Efficiency. I then adjusted each active players projection based on Doc Rivers' trajectory. At 33 years old, Doc had already put together 93% of his career Efficiency. Wade certainly may have more left as he plays for $20 million next year, but if he does only have 7% left then he would finish at 22,434.
Guerrero is certainly correct to put Mo Lucas No. 2. In fact, the late great is in a virtual tie right now with Wade and well ahead of where any other player projects. With regular season production virtually even with Wade, you can add Lucas five All-Star appearances, and the credit many expert observers gave him the most credit for delivering the Trail Blazers the NBA title the same year MU took the college crown. Not enough to match Wade's titles and All-Star games - but enough to say he is DEFINITELY the second greatest player to come out of MU to date.
Which leads us to Butler. He has a net efficiency of 3871, ahead of where current No. 3 Doc Rivers was at the age of 25. As dominant as he was this season it is possible he could make a run at Wade and Lucas, but he has a long way to go. It is actually a close call on if he can catch Rivers, Jim Chones (currently 4th) and/or Don Kojis (5th). Kojis is not exact because the NBA actually only recorded blocked shots and steals his final two seasons, so I had to estimate - but those three are VERY close right now for who is the third greatest.
Here is where the real surprise will start for some. Wesley Mattehews AND Jae Crowder both project to finish in the top eight - ahead of Thompson, Whitehead, Meminger, McNeill, McIlvaine, Smith etc.
Matthews is already in 7th with 6,319, BUT while he should easily pass George Thompson he is 28 years old and projected to be passed by both Butler (25 years old) and Crowder (24). Obviously we hope Wesley has a complete recovery, but even if he does Doc had already accumulated 63% of his value by this age, so the same track would get Matthews just above 10,000 by career end.
Butler projects to gradruple his 3871 to 15,484, and at 24 Crowder projects to still have 82% of his productivity left and be on course to actually nudge past Matthews (though it is basically a deadeven projection for a tie for 7th all-time)
Steve Novak has his valuable nitch - though overall his numbers do not add up to some of the old greats. Certainly we hope Dwight Buycks unbelievable three-point shooting during and ability to destroy Garry Harris in the few games played give him a chance for a late career, and that Jerel McNeal, DJO and ... okay, a little less enthusiastically ... Vander Blue find a nitch. Here is the breakdown for all 37 players:
Rk | Player | Eff | Age | %done | Proj Car | Pts+Reb+Ast+StlX2+BlkX2-TO-FGmiss--halfFTmiss |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dwyane Wade | 20864 | 33 | 93% | 22434 | 18812+3824+4600+2670+1434--2679--7052-745 |
2 | Maurice Lucas | 20158 | 100% | 20158 | 14857+9306+2498+1606+1318--2316--6652-459 | |
3 | Jimmy Butler | 3871 | 25 | 25% | 15484 | 2993+1093+516+660+216--271--1229-107 |
4 | Doc Rivers | 14614 | 100% | 14614 | 9377+2625+4889+3126+702--1651--4121-333 | |
5 | Jim Chones | 13785 | 100% | 13785 | 9821+6427+1292+782+1548--1165--4590-330 | |
6 | Don Kojis | 12991 | 100% | 12991 | 9948+4555+1112+859+1718-0--4906-399 | |
7 | Jae Crowder | 1929 | 24 | 18% | 10714 | 1376+674+248+388+126--139--708-36 |
8 | Wesley Matthews | 6319 | 28 | 63% | 10029 | 6294+1375+911+1010+162--604--2715-114 |
9 | George Thompson | 7520 | 100% | 7520 | 8114+1457+1561+915+150--954--3395-328 | |
10 | Jerome Whitehead | 6282 | 100% | 6282 | 4423+3268+374+502+400--696--1832-157 | |
11 | Dean Meminger | 3955 | 100% | 3955 | 2552+1086+1046+484+56-0--1108-161 | |
12 | Larry McNeill | 3502 | 100% | 3502 | 2533+1440+225+366+156--71--1048-99 | |
13 | Jim McIlvaine | 3227 | 100% | 3227 | 1072+1243+105+272+1382--231--525-91 | |
14 | Tony Smith | 3051 | 100% | 3051 | 2504+735+881+638+158--442--1345-78 | |
15 | Earl Tatum | 2893 | 100% | 2893 | 2508+682+507+638+202--289--1306-49 | |
16 | Lloyd Walton | 2448 | 100% | 2448 | 1442+370+1243+528+56--422--720-49 | |
17 | Steve Novak | 2083 | 32 | 91% | 2289 | 2148+583+132+182+76--80--951-7 |
18 | Chris Crawford | 1662 | 100% | 1662 | 1654+547+154+202+160--232--784-39 | |
19 | Travis Diener | 1122 | 100% | 1122 | 854+243+432+152+18--99--470-8 | |
20 | Bo Ellis | 1031 | 100% | 1031 | 613+482+113+138+168--145--312-26 | |
21 | Butch Lee | 839 | 100% | 839 | 773+137+307+174+2--164--362-28 | |
22 | Sam Worthen | 399 | 100% | 399 | 239+116+118+114+12--93--100-7 | |
23 | Amal McCaskill | 374 | 100% | 374 | 204+213+36+48+72--52--134-13 | |
24 | Bob Lackey | 355 | 100% | 355 | 413+164+137+2+0--121--206-34 | |
25 | Dwight Buycks | 98 | 26 | 39% | 251 | 95+35+24+22+0--22--55-1 |
26 | Vander Blue | 20 | 22 | 8% | 250 | 27+12+9+6+0--8--23-3 |
27 | Lazar Hayward | 215 | 100% | 215 | 207+90+35+34+16--28--132-7 | |
28 | Michael Wilson | 146 | 100% | 146 | 108+36+45+30+10--28--50-5 | |
29 | Tom Copa | 73 | 100% | 73 | 48+36+3+4+12--8--18-4 | |
30 | Bernard Toone | 61 | 100% | 61 | 55+34+12+8+10--16--41-1 | |
31 | Joe Thomas | 47 | 100% | 47 | 55+43+17+0+0-0--63-5 | |
32 | Brian Brunkhorst | 29 | 100% | 29 | 25+13+3+0+0--5--5-2 | |
33 | Jerel McNeal | 9 | 28 | 63% | 14 | 9+3+2+6+2--5--80 |
34 | Allie McGuire | 5 | 100% | 5 | 4+2+1+0+0-0--20 | |
35 | Gene Berce | -2 | 100% | -2 | 10++2+0+0-0--11-2 | |
36 | Bill Downey | -2 | 100% | -2 | 0++0+0+0-0--20 | |
37 | Darius Johnson-Odom | -4 | 25 | 25% | -16 | 0+6+2+2+0--2--11-1 |
Rk | Player | Eff | Age | %done | Proj Car | Pts+Reb+Ast+StlX2+BlkX2-TO-FGmiss--halfFTmiss |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: We welcome alternative opinions on CrackedSidewalks. However, this is not an open forum without moderation. If what you post fails to be intelligent or productive, we reserve the right to remove your comment from publication without hesitation.
Anonymous comments will be scrutinized.
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by forum participants on this web site do not necessarily reflect the CrackedSidewalks Team.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.